TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Foster v. Jackson & Clayton

Amelia E. Foster, in error v. Jackson & Clayton, in error

Foster v. Jackson & Clayton, 57 Ga. 206 (1876)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1876
Judges
Warner
Citations
57 Ga. 206
Headnotes
The seventh amendment to the constitution of the United States, providing for a trial by jury in all suits at common law where the amount in controversy shall exceed $20 00, relates only to proceedings in the United States courts.
Summary
Constitutional law. Jury. United States Courts. Before Judge McCutohen. Bartow Superior Court. January Term, 1876. Reported in the decision.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Warner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was an action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant on two promissory notes. At the trial of the case the defendant withdrew her plea, and there being no issuable defense filed on oath, the court awarded judgment against the defendant for the sum of $962 50,' principal, and $167 00 for interest, to the awarding of which judgment the defendant excepted on the ground that the court erred in awarding a judgment for more than $20 00, without the intervention of a jury, and the case was brought up to this court for review on a writ of error.

When the case was called here there was no appearance for the plaintiff in error, but the defendant in error made a motion to open the record, and prayed for an affirmance of the judgment, and also claimed damages for delay in bringing the case to this court. There was no error in awarding the judgment in this case by the court below, without the intervention of a jury. Article 7th of the amendments to the constitution of the Unitéd States, relates only to trials in the courts of the United States, and not to the trial of cases in the state courts, as has been repeatedly decided by'the supreme court of the *207 United States: 18 Howard’s Reports, 280; 21 Wallace’s Reports, 557, and other cases. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court 'below.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1901: 11905: 11966: 119012026peak 1901 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Butler v. Claxton146 S.E.2d 763 (Ga. 1966)
  2. Moore v. State52 S.E. 81 (Ga. 1905)
  3. Wheatley v. State39 S.E. 877 (Ga. 1901)

Most recent

  1. Butler v. Claxton146 S.E.2d 763 (Ga. 1966)
  2. Moore v. State52 S.E. 81 (Ga. 1905)
  3. Wheatley v. State39 S.E. 877 (Ga. 1901)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list