Thompson v. State
Thompson v. The State of Georgia
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Warner, Chief Justice.
The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and on his trial therefor, was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. A motion for a new trial was made on the sole ground of newly discovered evidence, which motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.
It appears from the evidence in the record, that the alleged offense was committed a short time before the trial, that the defendant was badly cut, and had been confined in jail up to the time of trial. The affidavit of the newly discovered *620 witness, states that she was present and saw the difficulty between deceased and defendant, and that she would swear, amongst other things, “ that Tony Mason, the deceased, said to defendant: ‘ I got one child by your sister, and I’ll be damned if I don’t get another one if I can.’ Defendant told deceased not to throw that up to him. Deceased said, ‘By God, I am a man.’ The quarrel commenced when deceased told defendant about the child. Deceased was trying very hard to get to the Thompson boys, and deceased cut defendant in the thigh before deceased was cut. The Thompson boys did not try to get to deceased until after defendant was cut by deceased. After deceased cut defendant in the thigh lie'tried very hard to cut him again. The whole crowd was drunk.”
Assuming Ann Eliza Gunn to be a credible witness (and there is nothing in the record going to show that she is not), then her evidence upon another trial, in view of the evidence had on the former trial, might produce a different result, inasmuch as the evidence is material and is not merely cumulative. Besides, the judge who overruled the motion for a new trial was not the same judge who presided at the trial of the case. On the statement of facts contained in the record, a new trial is ordered.
Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.