TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thompson v. State

Thompson v. The State of Georgia

Thompson v. State, 60 Ga. 619 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 15, 1878
Judges
Warner
Citations
60 Ga. 619
Headnotes
Newly discovered evidence which would probably produce a different result, and is not cumulative, is ground for new trial, where the de.fendant was badly cut and confined in jail up to the time of trial, which occurred shortly after the homicide for which he was indicted, and neither he nor his counsel had earlier opportunity to know of the evidence.
Summary
Criminal law. New trial. Before Judge Hall. Butts Superior Court. September Term, 1877. At the March term, 1877, of Butts superior court, Thompson was tried for the murder of one Mason, and found guilty of manslaughter. At the next term he moved for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the affidavits accompanying the motion showing the facts stated in the head-note and decision. Ann Eliza Gunn was the new witness. Judge Hall, who heard the motion (though it appears that Judge Buchanan presided at the trial), overruled it, and defendant excepted.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Warner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and on his trial therefor, was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. A motion for a new trial was made on the sole ground of newly discovered evidence, which motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

It appears from the evidence in the record, that the alleged offense was committed a short time before the trial, that the defendant was badly cut, and had been confined in jail up to the time of trial. The affidavit of the newly discovered *620 witness, states that she was present and saw the difficulty between deceased and defendant, and that she would swear, amongst other things, “ that Tony Mason, the deceased, said to defendant: ‘ I got one child by your sister, and I’ll be damned if I don’t get another one if I can.’ Defendant told deceased not to throw that up to him. Deceased said, ‘By God, I am a man.’ The quarrel commenced when deceased told defendant about the child. Deceased was trying very hard to get to the Thompson boys, and deceased cut defendant in the thigh before deceased was cut. The Thompson boys did not try to get to deceased until after defendant was cut by deceased. After deceased cut defendant in the thigh lie'tried very hard to cut him again. The whole crowd was drunk.”

Assuming Ann Eliza Gunn to be a credible witness (and there is nothing in the record going to show that she is not), then her evidence upon another trial, in view of the evidence had on the former trial, might produce a different result, inasmuch as the evidence is material and is not merely cumulative. Besides, the judge who overruled the motion for a new trial was not the same judge who presided at the trial of the case. On the statement of facts contained in the record, a new trial is ordered.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1879–1880: 11899–1900: 11909–1910: 11931–1932: 11941–1942: 118792026peak 1879 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.17 S.E.2d 825 (Ga. 1941)
  2. Williams v. State162 S.E. 377 (Ga. 1932) · Dissent
  3. Carr v. State32 S.E. 844 (Ga. 1899)
  4. Mayor of Athens v. Peeler65 S.E. 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909)
  5. Lavelle v. City of Scranton1 Law Times (N.S.) 217 (1879)

Most recent

  1. Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.17 S.E.2d 825 (Ga. 1941)
  2. Williams v. State162 S.E. 377 (Ga. 1932) · Dissent
  3. Mayor of Athens v. Peeler65 S.E. 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909)
  4. Carr v. State32 S.E. 844 (Ga. 1899)
  5. Lavelle v. City of Scranton1 Law Times (N.S.) 217 (1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list