TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gill v. Tison

Gill v. Tison, 61 Ga. 161 (1878)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 15, 1878
Judges
Warner
Citations
61 Ga. 161
Headnotes
1. Where it appears on the face of the declaration that suit was brought against certain agents, although their principals were known, a demurrer was properly sustained. 2. An amendment will not be allowed striking out the agents and substituting their principals.
Summary
Principal and agent. Amendment. Parties. Practice in the Superior Court. Before Judge Crisp. Lee Superior Court. March Term, 1878. Eeported in the decision.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Warner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants “as *162 agents of, and committee appointed by, tbe properly constituted authorities of the Masonic Hall and Leesburg Academy,” to recover an amount of money alleged to be due him for removing a certain described brick building from Starksville and rebuilding the same at Leesburg, the lower part of said building being occupied as an academy, and the upper part occupied by the Masonic fraternity, known as Eureka Lodge. The defendants demurred to the plaintiffs declaration, upon the ground that the Eureka Lodge having been incorporated under the laws of this state, was not sued in plaintiff’s action, and that the persons named in the declaration were sued as agents, when the owners of the property should have been sued. The plaintiff then proposed to amend his declaration by inserting, after the word “showeth,” the following, “the Eureka Lodge and Leesburg Academy, represented by J. P. Tison, R. B. Armstrong, J. Hill yer, T. H. West and H. L. Long, it appearing that the said persons are the officers of the said lodge, worshipful master and wardens,” and also by striking out the word “committee” wherever it appears in the declaration, and insert in lieu thereof the word “defendants.” The court refused to allow the proposed amendment, and sustained the demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration ; whereupon the plaintiff excepted.

The suit should have been brought against the principals and not against the agents, Code, 3257, 39 Ga., 35 . The amendment proposed to substitute two new and distinct parties, (to-wit), the “Eureka Lodge, and Leesburg Academy,” as defendants, and was properly refused, Code, 3180. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1879–1880: 11881–1882: 11885–1886: 21917–1918: 11923–1924: 11937–1938: 11947–1948: 11949–1950: 11953–1954: 11965–1966: 118792026peak 1885 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arnett v. Board of Commissioners75 Ga. 782 (1885)
  2. Smith v. White43 S.E.2d 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
  3. Jones v. Watson63 Ga. 679 (1879)
  4. Pearl Assurance Co. v. Bernath196 S.E. 389 (Ga. 1938)
  5. Ruffner v. Dunlop124 S.E. 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
  6. Adams v. Barlow69 Ga. 302 (1882)

Most recent

  1. LeCraw v. Burdine Enterprises, Inc.143 S.E.2d 679 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
  2. Scoggins v. Hill82 S.E.2d 739 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
  3. Childs v. Hampton57 S.E.2d 291 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  4. Smith v. White43 S.E.2d 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
  5. Pearl Assurance Co. v. Bernath196 S.E. 389 (Ga. 1938)
  6. Ruffner v. Dunlop124 S.E. 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Tiller v. Spradley, 39 Ga. 35 (1869) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list