TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paschal v. State

Paschal v. The State of Georgia

Paschal v. State, 68 Ga. 818 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 15, 1882
Judges
Jackson
Citations
68 Ga. 818
Headnotes
Where an indictment charged the commission of an assault with intent to commit murder by using a weapon likely to produce death, the proof must show that such was the character of the weapon. This may be done by producing the instrument itself, or showing the effect of it, or other satisfactory evidence, but must be done in some way. Code, §4359; 57 Ga., 107; 59 Ib., 638; 32 Ib., 672; 50 Ib., 591.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Jackson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Jackson, Chief Justice.

[Allen Paschal was indicted for assault with intent to murder, “ with a certain stick, loaded at the end with lead, said stick being a weapon likely to produce death.” On the trial, the only evidence as to the nature of the weapon used by defendant was as follows : One witness testified *819 that he had seen defendant some three years ago with a stick which was loaded with lead. Another testified, that in the act of striking, “ the head of the stick shined like a silver dollar,” the alleged assault having been committed on a “ star-light night.” A witness for the defence testified that the defendant was accustomed to walking with an ordinary hickory stick, weighing not more than a pound. Defendant admitted the fact of striking with a stick, but pleaded not guilty to the offence as' charged in the indictment.

Counsel for the defence requested the court to charge the jury that “ where the indictment charges the defendant with the offence of assault with intent to murder by using a stick, an instrument likely to produce death, then it is incumbent on the state to- prove the allegations.” The request was refused ; defendant was found guilty, and excepted.]

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1898: 11904: 11906: 11919: 11934: 11940: 11943: 21947: 118982026peak 1943 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dixon v. State175 S.E. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
  2. Paschal v. State54 S.E. 172 (Ga. 1906)
  3. Kennedy v. State11 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. 1940)
  4. Moran v. State48 S.E. 324 (Ga. 1904)
  5. Kennedy v. State24 S.E.2d 321 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943)
  6. Meriwether v. State30 S.E. 806 (Ga. 1898)

Most recent

  1. Kryder v. State41 S.E.2d 824 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
  2. Blakewood v. State25 S.E.2d 643 (Ga. 1943)
  3. Kennedy v. State24 S.E.2d 321 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943)
  4. Kennedy v. State11 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. 1940)
  5. Dixon v. State175 S.E. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
  6. Breedlove v. State101 S.E. 709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list