TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Georgia Chemical, Co. v. Colquitt

The Georgia Chemical, etc., Company v. Colquitt

Ga. Chem., Co. v. Colquitt, 72 Ga. 172 (1884)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1884
Judges
Blandford
Citations
72 Ga. 172
Headnotes
If a public nuisance causes special damage to an individual, in which the public do not participate, such special damage gives a right of action; and as an action may be brought for every day the nuisance continues, equity, which aohors a multiplicity of suits, will entertain jurisdiction, so as to do full and complete justice between the parties and terminate the litigation.
Summary
Nuisance. Damages. Injunction. ■ Equity. Before Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Blandford

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Blandford, Justice.

The question here is, can a court of equity restrain a public nuisance which causes special damage to individuals ?

The bill alleges (hat plaintiffs in error are engaged in manufacturing sulphuric acid near their residences and families; that it causes their shade, ornamental trees and shrubbery to die; causes sickness, coughs, etc., in and among their families and children; it emits the most poisonous and noxious vapors, etc.

If a public nuisance causes special damage to an individual, in which the public do not p irticipate, such special damage gives a right of action. Code, §2998. The action may be brought for every day the nuisance continues; equity, abhorring a multiplicity of suits, will entertain jurisdiction, so as to do full and complete justice between the parties, and prevent a multiplicity of suits, thus ending litigation and contention. But this is not an open ques *173 tionin this court. See Norwood vs. Dickey, 18 Ga., 528 ; Minor et al. vs. De Vaughn, decided at the present term of this court.

There is equity in the bill filed by defendants in error, and the'decree of the court below overruling the demurrer thereto is right, and the same is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1887: 11899: 11901: 11905: 11909: 11911: 11922: 11930: 118872026peak 1887 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.34 S.E. 852 (Ga. 1899)
  2. Gray Lumber Co. v. Gaskin50 S.E. 164 (Ga. 1905)
  3. Hill v. McBurney Oil & Fertilizer Co.52 L.R.A. 398 (Ga. 1901)
  4. Town of Rentz v. Roach115 S.E. 94 (Ga. 1922)
  5. Kavanagh v. Mobile & Girard Railroad2 S.E. 636 (Ga. 1887)
  6. Albany Theatre Inc. v. Short154 S.E. 895 (Ga. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Albany Theatre Inc. v. Short154 S.E. 895 (Ga. 1930)
  2. Town of Rentz v. Roach115 S.E. 94 (Ga. 1922)
  3. Manning v. Webb72 S.E. 401 (Ga. 1911)
  4. Montgomery v. Jackson65 S.E. 140 (Ga. 1909)
  5. Gray Lumber Co. v. Gaskin50 S.E. 164 (Ga. 1905)
  6. Hill v. McBurney Oil & Fertilizer Co.52 L.R.A. 398 (Ga. 1901)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Norwood v. Dickey, 18 Ga. 528 (1855) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list