TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

N. & A. F. Tift & Co. v. Carlton

N. & A. F. Tift & Company v. Carlton

N. & A. F. Tift & Co. v. Carlton, 73 Ga. 145 (1884)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 4, 1884
Judges
Blandeord
Citations
73 Ga. 145
Disposition
Judgment reversed.
Headnotes
Where suit was brought in the statutory form on two drafts, upon the-face of which it appeared that the plaintiffs were the acceptors and the defendants were the drawer and payee, who was also endorser, an amendment could be made, alleging that the acceptors were mere accommodation acceptors and had paid the money for the defendants. Code, §§3479, 3480.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Blandeord

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Blandeord, Justice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list