Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
Frazier v. The Georgia Railroad & Banking Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. The father has no right of action under the act of October 27th, 1887 (Acts 1887, p. 43), for the homicide of a minor child, if the mother was in life at the time of the homicide. If, in such case, she died without bringing an action for the homicide, no such right of action survived to, or was conferred upon, the father by the above recited act.
2. Construing all together the allegations of the plaintiff’s declaration, it was manifestly intended to be an action for the homicide of his minor son, and cannot be construed as an action for the services of such son. Judgment affirmed.
Samuel H. Sibley, for plaintiff'. Joseph B. & Bryan Cumming and M. P. Reese, for defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.