Eldridge v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
The evidence in this case, though entirely circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the verdict of guilty having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not overrule his refusal to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Simmons, C. J.,
dissenting. — A conviction should not be sustained where it is manifest that the verdict was predicated merely on suspicion and against the positive evidence'of a legally credible unimpeached witness.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.