TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Black v. Walker

Black v. Walker, 26 S.E. 477 (Ga. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 2, 1895
Citations
26 S.E. 47798 Ga. 31
Summary
Complaint on notes. Before Judge Yan Epps. City court of Atlanta. January term, 1895.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Atkinson, J.

1. The maker of promissory notes given for the purchase of land of which such maker holds undisturbed possession under a bond from the vendor, conditioned to make to the former a good and sufficient title to the land upon payment of the notes, can neither voluntarily rescind the contract of purchase nor defeat the collection of the notes, upon the ground that the vendor has not in fact a good title to the land in question, without showing clearly that there is a paramount outstanding title against the vendor, and also proving fraud upon his part, or that he is insolvent, or a non-resident, or else proving other facts which would authorize equitable interference with the carrying out of the contract as made.

2. There being in the present case no proof whatever of fraud or insolvency on the part of the plaintiffs, who. were the defendant’s vendors, and the defendant, irrespective of the question whether or not a paramount outstanding title against' the plaintiffs was shown, having in other respects entirely failed take the case out of the rule of law announced in the preceding note, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →
1896: 11898: 11899: 21905: 11914: 11915: 21917: 11923: 21924: 21926: 21927: 11929: 11931: 11932: 11936: 11937: 11940: 21941: 118962026peak 1899 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bank of Bullochville v. Riehle137 S.E. 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)
  2. Early v. Conn10 S.E.2d 177 (Ga. 1940)
  3. Middleton v. Pruden14 S.E.2d 82 (Ga. 1941)
  4. Henderson v. Fields85 S.E. 741 (Ga. 1915)
  5. Crowell v. Brim12 S.E.2d 585 (Ga. 1940)
  6. Joiner v. Southern Land Sales Corp.124 S.E. 518 (Ga. 1924)

Most recent

  1. Middleton v. Pruden14 S.E.2d 82 (Ga. 1941)
  2. Crowell v. Brim12 S.E.2d 585 (Ga. 1940)
  3. Early v. Conn10 S.E.2d 177 (Ga. 1940)
  4. Campbell v. Gormley192 S.E. 430 (Ga. 1937)
  5. Pruden v. Middleton186 S.E. 732 (Ga. 1936)
  6. Archibald Hardware Co. v. Gifford163 S.E. 254 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list