Davis v. Chaplin
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Cobb, J.
This court will not reverse a judgment granting a second new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence, when it appears-from the record that the evidence in support of the verdict was. at best weak and unsatisfactory, and the decided preponderance of the testimony was on the side pf the losing party. - - .
Judgment .affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Falligant. Chatham superior court. December term, 1896. Joseph A. Cronk, for plaintiff. Charlton, Machall & Anderson and Garrard, Meldrim & Newman, for defendants.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.