Munroe v. Haas
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Little, J.
Where, upon the trial in a justice’s court of an action upon a promissory note signed by a husband and wife, there was affirmative and uncontradicted evidence that the latter, in signing, contracted as a surety only, which fact was known to the agent of the payee by whom the note was taken, a verdict against the wife was contrary to law, and the superior court erred in not setting it aside op. certiorari.
Judgment reversed.
All concurring, except Gobb, J., absent.
Certiorari. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior Court. January term, 1897. J3. S. Griffith, for plaintiff in error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.