TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Payton v. Monroe

Payton v. Monroe Payton v. Phillips

Payton v. Monroe, 34 S.E. 305 (Ga. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 1, 1899
Judges
Little
Citations
34 S.E. 305110 Ga. 2621899 Ga. LEXIS 515
Summary
Levy and claim. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. January term, 1899.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Little

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Little, J.

On the death of a wife intestate, leaving a separate estate (in lands), without remainder or limitation over, title to such estate vests at her death in her heirs at law; and where these heirs are a husband and minor children, they take the estate share and share alike (Civil Code, §3354), and the share of the husband is subject to the payment of his debts. This is true notwithstanding the husband was ignorant that the law of inheritance vested in him title to any" ■part of said estate, and though he refused, upon ascertaining that such was the law, to accept his share. The court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11916: 11946: 11949: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Slawson's Estate41 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1949)
  2. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. DeMoss113 N.E. 417 (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)
  3. Bethea v. Dixon39 S.E.2d 562 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946)
  4. Moliter v. Wabash Railroad168 S.W. 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)

Most recent

  1. In re Slawson's Estate41 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1949)
  2. Bethea v. Dixon39 S.E.2d 562 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946)
  3. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. DeMoss113 N.E. 417 (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)
  4. Moliter v. Wabash Railroad168 S.W. 250 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list