Crawford v. Mayor of Hawkinsville
Crawford v. Mayor and Council of Hawkinsville
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lewis, J.
Under the facts as disclosed by the record, it appears that the plaintiff in error was a “traveling salesman” within the meaning of theiact approved December 14, 1896 (Acts 1896, p. 36); and this case, therefore, falls within the principle ruled by this court in Kimmel v. Americus, 105 Ga. 694 . It follows that the conviction was contrary to law, and that the court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.