TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wynn v. Harrison

Wynn v. Harrison, 35 S.E. 643 (Ga. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 7, 1900
Judges
Lewis
Citations
35 S.E. 643111 Ga. 8161900 Ga. LEXIS 746
Summary
Certiorari. Before Judge Reese. Hancock superior court. August term, 1899.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lewis

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Lewis, J.

When a father permits his minor son to use for a particular purpose a chattel belonging to the former, and the latter, without authority, undertakes to sell or dispose of the property, and in so doing yields possession thereof to a third person, the father may maintain a possessory warrant for the purpose of recovering possession. This is so for the reason that, in legal contemplation, the possession of the son was that of the father, and the attempt, in the manner stated, to deprive him of that possession was wrongful and tortious, the minor being unable to make any binding consent as to the matter.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1902: 11906: 11923: 11929: 11944: 119022026peak 1902 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown v. Todd53 S.E. 678 (Ga. 1906)
  2. Industrial Lumber Co. v. Strickland30 S.E.2d 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
  3. Whitworth v. Carter147 S.E. 904 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
  4. Sheriff v. Thompson42 S.E. 738 (Ga. 1902)
  5. Wilburn v. Beasley119 S.E. 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Industrial Lumber Co. v. Strickland30 S.E.2d 792 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
  2. Whitworth v. Carter147 S.E. 904 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
  3. Wilburn v. Beasley119 S.E. 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
  4. Brown v. Todd53 S.E. 678 (Ga. 1906)
  5. Sheriff v. Thompson42 S.E. 738 (Ga. 1902)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list