TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Garbutt Lumber Co. v. Gress Lumber Co.

Garbutt Lumber Company v. Gress Lumber Company

Garbutt Lumber Co. v. Gress Lumber Co., 35 S.E. 686 (Ga. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 10, 1900
Judges
Fish
Citations
35 S.E. 686111 Ga. 8211900 Ga. LEXIS 757
Summary
Petition for injunction. Before Judge Smith. Wilcox county. December 29, 1899.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Fish

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Fish, J.

1. Before secondary evidence as to the contents of an alleged lost

deed can be competent, it must be shown not only that an original once existed, but that it was properly executed. Bigelow v. Young, 30 Ga. 121 ; *822 Durham v. Holeman, Id. 619 ; Eston v. Freeman, 63 Ga. 535 ; Calhoun v. Calhoun, 81 Ga. 91 ; Dasher v. Ellis, 102 Ga. 830 .

Argued March 20. — Decided April 10, 1900. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Smith. Wilcox county. December 29, 1899. Hal Laivson, Eldridge Cuffs, and Bankston & Cannon, for plaintiff. E. D. Graham and C. J. Haden, for defendant.

2. “ The execution of a lost deed embracing lands in two counties can not be proved, as to land in one of the counties wherein the deed was never recorded, by a certified copy from the record of the other county, in which it was duly recorded. And without first proving the execution of an original deed, a copy of the same taken from the records of a county in which the land in controversy is not situate, can not be received in evidence.” Bagley v. Kennedy, 94 Ga. 651 ; Chapman v. Floyd, 68 Ga. 455 (5); Hayden v. Mitchell, 103 Ga. 431 .

3. There being no proof of the execution of the alleged lost deed, there was no error in rejecting the offered evidence of its contents.

4. There was no.abuse of discretion in l-efusing to grant an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1902: 11921: 11922: 11937: 11947: 11951: 119022026peak 1902 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Head v. Lee45 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. 1947)
  2. Sharp v. Autry194 S.E. 194 (Ga. 1937)
  3. Drawdy v. Musslewhite107 S.E. 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921)
  4. Farrar v. Gulf Oil Corp.66 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. 1951)
  5. Griffin v. Wise41 S.E. 1003 (Ga. 1902)
  6. Walker v. State111 S.E. 657 (Ga. 1922)

Most recent

  1. Farrar v. Gulf Oil Corp.66 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. 1951)
  2. Head v. Lee45 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. 1947)
  3. Sharp v. Autry194 S.E. 194 (Ga. 1937)
  4. Walker v. State111 S.E. 657 (Ga. 1922)
  5. Drawdy v. Musslewhite107 S.E. 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921)
  6. Griffin v. Wise41 S.E. 1003 (Ga. 1902)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Bigelow v. Young, 30 Ga. 121 (1860) 20
Hayden v. Mitchell, 30 S.E. 287 (Ga. 1898) 30
Chapman v. Floyd, 68 Ga. 455 (1882) 15
Calhoun v. Calhoun, 6 S.E. 913 (Ga. 1888) 10
Dasher v. Ellis, 30 S.E. 544 (Ga. 1898) 9
Eaton v. Freeman, 63 Ga. 535 (1879) 4
Bagley v. Kennedy, 94 Ga. 651 (1894) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list