TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Helmly v. Davis

Helmly v. Davis, 36 S.E. 927 (Ga. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 7, 1900
Judges
Simmons
Citations
36 S.E. 927111 Ga. 8601900 Ga. LEXIS 840
Summary
Dismissal of motion for new trial. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. November 16, 1899.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Simmons

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Simmons, C. J.

Where a motion for a new trial is made in term and ordered heard on a certain day in vacation, and, through no fault on thepart of the movant, is not heard on the day appointed, and no order is.taken extending the time, such motion is, by operation of law, returned to the court and remains until called up in its order. It is error to dismiss such a motion because it was not heard at the appointed time. “ Jurisdiction to proceed in term is not lost by an order to hear at chambers.” Higginbotham v. Campbell, 85 Ga. 639 ; Civil Code, § 5485 ; Dozier v. Owens, 63 Ga. 541 ; Brantley v. Hass, 69 Ga. 748 ; West v. Tones, 69 Ga. 763 ; Carroll v. Ry. Co., 82 Ga. 452 ; Central R. Co. v. Pool, 95 Ga. 410 .

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1902: 11917: 11924: 11974: 119022026peak 1902 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Luke v. Luke123 S.E. 716 (Ga. 1924)
  2. Richards v. State206 S.E.2d 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
  3. Moore v. Citizens Bank91 S.E. 932 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  4. McPhail v. State42 S.E. 1001 (Ga. 1902)

Most recent

  1. Richards v. State206 S.E.2d 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
  2. Luke v. Luke123 S.E. 716 (Ga. 1924)
  3. Moore v. Citizens Bank91 S.E. 932 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  4. McPhail v. State42 S.E. 1001 (Ga. 1902)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Carroll v. East Tenn., 82 Ga. 452 (1889) 19
Cent. R.R. & Banking Co. v. Pool, 22 S.E. 631 (Ga. 1895) 11
Dozier v. Owen, 63 Ga. 539 (1879) 3
Brantley v. Hass, 69 Ga. 748 (1882) 3
West v. Jones, 69 Ga. 763 (1882) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list