Georgia R. R. & Bkg. Co. v. Fitzgerald
Georgia R. R. & Bkg. Co. v. Fitzgerald, and vice versa
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Fish, J.
There being no exception to the rulings of the court during the progress of the trial, or to the charge, and there being sufficient evi- . dence to support the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment, on main bill of exceptions, affirmed; on cross-bill, dismissed.
All the Justices concurring.
Action for damages. Before Judge Russell. Walton superior court. August term, 1899. Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, for the railroad company. LI. G. Roney and W. S. TJpshaw, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.