Atlanta Machine Works v. Pope & Dye
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Fish, J.
1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial which are not approved by the trial judge can not be considered by this court.
2. It is not erroneous for the trial judge to refuse to give a request to charge when such request is not in writing.
3. There was no material error in the charges excepted to, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.