Carter v. Dunson
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Cobb, J.
The ruling complained of being one granting a first new trial, and it not appearing that the law and the facts demanded a finding in favor of the prevailing party, the judgment will be affirmed, notwithstanding the grant of the new trial seems to have been based upon a single ground in the motion, and without regard to whether or not this ground was well taken. Carolee v. Handelis, 103 Ga. 302 ; Weinkle v. Railroad, 107 Ga. 367 , and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.