Union Casualty & Surety Co. v. Winship
Union Casualty and Surety Company v. Winship
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Little, J.
Whether the receipt admitted in evidence was or was not relevant depended on the conclusions to be drawn from other testimony in the case ; and the court, in allowing this paper to go to the jury, did so under proper limitations. It does not, therefore, appear that there was any error in admitting the document. This being so, the special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit; and so also are the general grounds, there being in the record evidence sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.