TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Loyd v. Webster

Loyd v. Webster, 42 S.E. 1013 (Ga. 1902)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 11, 1902
Judges
Candeek
Citations
42 S.E. 1013116 Ga. 7281902 Ga. LEXIS 236
Summary
Practice in the Supreme Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Candeek

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Candeek, J.

1. The judgment oí a judge of the superior court in vacation, appointing trustees, can not be reviewed by this court upon a fast writ of error ,■ notwithstanding there was also in the petition a. prayer for injunction, it appearing that no action was taken by the court upon the application for injunction.

2. Under the ruling of this court in the case of Smith v. Willis, 105 Ga. 840 , and upon application of counsel for the plaintiff in error, it is ordered that this case be transferred to the docket of the next term.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James v. Wilkerson138 S.E. 71 (Ga. 1927)

Most recent

  1. James v. Wilkerson138 S.E. 71 (Ga. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Smith v. Willis, 32 S.E. 92 (Ga. 1898) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list