Arnold v. State
Arnold v. State, 45 S.E. 59 (Ga. 1903)
Summary
Accusation of gaining. Before Judge Hollingsworth. City court of Fayetteville. May 2, 1903.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lamar, J.
In a prosecution for gambling it is sufficient to show that the defendant, with others, played at cards for money, without proof of the character of the game, or which of the players lost or won.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.