Milner v. Pitts & Son
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lamas, J.
The claimant testified that the land had been sold under a judgment younger than the mortgage, and that he bid at the request of the mortgagee’s agent, with the understanding that the lien of the mortgage should be transferred to the fund. The mortgagee was not present, and his agent denied that he made such an arrangement, or that he had any authority so to do, and by his own testimony, and that of the sheriff and bystanders, showed that public notice of the mortgage was given at the time of the execution sale. Where the equity of redemption is levied on, it requires the consent of the mortgagor, mortgagee and plaintiff in fi. fa., in order to allow the entire estate to be sold. Civil Code, § 2759; Hynds v. Oglesby, 93 Ga. 542 . Under this statute, and the undisputed evidence, a verdict finding the land levied on subject to the mortgage fi. fa. was demanded by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.