TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Loyd v. Anderson

Loyd v. Anderson, 47 S.E. 208 (Ga. 1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 30, 1904
Judges
Turner
Citations
47 S.E. 208119 Ga. 8751904 Ga. LEXIS 389
Summary
Complaint. Before Judge Robinson. City court of Wrights-ville. February 17, 1903.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Turner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Turner, J.

This being a suit for a balance alleged to be due on an open account, wherein the defendant was charged with a cash item and credited with various amounts representing the value of certain timber accepted in part payment; and the evidence adduced at the trial disclosing that the plaintiff’s cause of action (if any) was for a breach of a covenant with respect to the number of feet in a quantity of hewn timber sold and delivered to him for cash, under an agreement between himself and the defendant to abide by a measurement of the timber subsequently to be made by a disinterested third person, a recovery in favor of the plaintiff was unwarranted, he having failed to prove his case as laid.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11941: 219362026peak 1941 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cunningham v. Avakian15 S.E.2d 493 (Ga. 1941)
  2. Williams v. Eldridge186 S.E. 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936)
  3. Davis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society16 S.E.2d 892 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Davis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society16 S.E.2d 892 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)
  2. Cunningham v. Avakian15 S.E.2d 493 (Ga. 1941)
  3. Williams v. Eldridge186 S.E. 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list