TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.

Mock v. Savannah and Statesboro Railway Company

Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Ry. Co., 50 S.E. 121 (Ga. 1905)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 7, 1905
Judges
Pish
Citations
50 S.E. 121122 Ga. 3851905 Ga. LEXIS 216
Summary
Action for damages. Before Judge Evans. Bulloch superior court. February 15, 1904.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Pish

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pish, P. J.

If the verdict was not demanded by the law and the evidence, the Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, though it was put upon a single ground ; nor will it determine whether the trial court was right in granting the motion on the special ground.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Evans, J., disqualified.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 11914: 11917: 21923: 11933: 119092026peak 1917 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cox v. Grady64 S.E. 262 (Ga. 1909)
  2. McCarty v. Mobley80 S.E. 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
  3. Parks v. Stevens94 S.E. 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  4. Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock91 S.E. 928 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  5. Daniel v. Mitchell168 S.E. 12 (Ga. 1933)
  6. Sampson v. Smith116 S.E. 652 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Daniel v. Mitchell168 S.E. 12 (Ga. 1933)
  2. Sampson v. Smith116 S.E. 652 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923)
  3. Parks v. Stevens94 S.E. 60 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  4. Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock91 S.E. 928 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917)
  5. McCarty v. Mobley80 S.E. 523 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
  6. Cox v. Grady64 S.E. 262 (Ga. 1909)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list