Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Mims
Atlanta and West Point Railroad Company v. Mims
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Simmons;, C. J.
While the evidence for the plaintiff below is weak, the jury, by consent of both parties; were Neffnitted to personally inspect the premises where the tort was .committed, and, under the, rule laid down in City of Atlanta v. Milam, 95 Ga. 135 , the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.