Franklin v. Pritchard Bros.
Franklin v. Pritchard Brothers
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lamar, J.
1. Where there is nothing to show that a letter has been lost, it-is not error to refuse to admit secondary evidence as to its contents.
2, There being no complaint made of the charge of the court, and the testimony, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the finding, this court will not interfere with his refusal to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.