Gray v. Wright
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Candler, J.
1. A consent decree will not be set aside because, “ through accident and mistake,” one of the consenting parties failed to introduce evidence which was in his possession and which might, if submitted on a trial, have resulted in the rendition of a decree different from the one which was taken by consent.
2. It is not error to refuse to entertain a petition to enjoin the cutting of timber on land which, by a decree to which the plaintiff consented, has been legally adjudged to be the property of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.