TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Foster v. Case

Foster v. Case, 55 S.E. 921 (Ga. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 12, 1906
Judges
Lumpkin
Citations
55 S.E. 921126 Ga. 7141906 Ga. LEXIS 521
Summary
Petition for. injunction. Before Judge Lewis. Baldwin superior court. May 17, 1906.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Lumpkin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Lumpkin, J.

1. When a will has been probated in common form, and the sole heir at law, by petition to the court of ordinary, has called upon the executor to probate it in solemn form, and has filed a caveat, a suit by the executor against such heir at law to recover property devised in the will may, in a proper case, be enjoined until the issue of devisavitvel non has been determined. Hooks v. Brown, 125 Ga. 122 . This, however, is not an arbitrary rule, but a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court, under the facts of the particular case.

2. In this ease there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the injunction as prayed, but, instead thereof, enjoining the executrix from, paying out or otherwise disposing of any of the assets until further order.

3. Rulings on a demurrer or a motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer to an answer to an equitable petition as a whole, and also certain parts thereof, are not reviewable on a “fast writ” of error. If, under the law and evidence applicable to the case, there was no error in denying an injunction, no reversal can be had on the ground that the presiding judge refused on the hearing to strike certain parts of the answer, upon motion made therefor.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 11914: 11932: 11933: 11934: 11938: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Richards v. McHan76 S.E. 382 (Ga. 1912)
  2. Bradley v. Lithonia & Arabia Mountain Railroad82 S.E. 138 (Ga. 1914)
  3. Durham v. Dowling163 S.E. 503 (Ga. 1932)
  4. Pinson v. Beamer176 S.E. 376 (Ga. 1934)
  5. Daniel v. Chastaine171 S.E. 373 (Ga. 1933)
  6. Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co.199 S.E. 117 (Ga. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co.199 S.E. 117 (Ga. 1938)
  2. Pinson v. Beamer176 S.E. 376 (Ga. 1934)
  3. Daniel v. Chastaine171 S.E. 373 (Ga. 1933)
  4. Durham v. Dowling163 S.E. 503 (Ga. 1932)
  5. Bradley v. Lithonia & Arabia Mountain Railroad82 S.E. 138 (Ga. 1914)
  6. Richards v. McHan76 S.E. 382 (Ga. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hooks v. Brown, 53 S.E. 583 (Ga. 1906) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list