Paulk v. Greer
Paulk v. Greer, ordinary
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Lumpkin, J.
This case having been submitted to the presiding judge without a jury, and, upon consideration of both of the evidence and the law, he having denied the mandamus absolute prayed for, upon a careful consideration of the evidence introduced by both sides and the law applicable thereto this court can not say that the judge erred in rendering such judgment. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
J. A. Qomer, Fulwood & Murray, and J. H. Hall, for plaintiffs. John B. Hutcheson and W. A. Hawkins, for defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.