Mount v. Wall
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. A bond conditioned for the forthcoming of property-levied on under an execution, which is payable to the plaintiff in execution, is not good as statutory bond; but if the obligors or either of them receive from the levying' officer the property levied on upon the tendering of such bond, the obligor receiving the property would be liable thereon in the event the- condition should not be complied with. The reception of the property would be a sufficient consideration to support the promise to have the property forthcoming at the time and place of sale. See Wall v. Mount, 121 Ga. 831 .
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the excerpt from the charge complained of, in the light of the evidence, did not contain any error prejudicial to the losing party.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.