City of Lawrenceville v. Born
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Evans, J.
This was an action of trespass, and there was evidence from which the jury could find that the plaintiff had title to the land, and had sustained damage to the extent of the verdict, occasioned by the defendant’s trespass. Hence thei'e was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in overruling a motion for new trial, complaining that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and without evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.