Kennedy v. Hagans
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. A ground of a motion for new trial which selects several fragments of sentences from different parts of the charge of the court, which are incomplete and unintelligible as set out in such ground, is not sufficiently definite to present any question for determination by this court. Holland v. Williams, 126 Ga. 617 ( 55 S. E. 1023 ).
2. The evidence which was introduced without objection was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
All the Jtistices coneur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.