TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kehr v. Floyd & Co.

Kehr v. Floyd & Company

Kehr v. Floyd & Co., 69 S.E. 550 (Ga. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 19, 1910
Judges
Atkinson
Citations
69 S.E. 550135 Ga. 4241910 Ga. LEXIS 563
Summary
Motion to reinstate. Before Judge Seabrook. Effingham superior court. November 11, 1909.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Atkinson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Atkinson, J.

1. After a general demurrer to a declaration has been sustained and the cause dismissed by the superior court, and that judgment affirmed in the Supreme Court without condition or direction, the declaration is not amendable. Central R. Co. v. Patterson, 87 Ga. 646 ( 13 S. E. 525 ) ; Benning v. Horkan, 123 Ga. 454 ( 51 S. E. 333 ) ; Goldsmith v. Georgia R. Co., 62 Ga. 543 .

(a) Accordingly it was not erroneous in the present ease, after the decision of the Supreme Court and before the remittitur was made the judgment of the superior court, for the judge to refuse to allow the plaintiffs to reinstate the ease in the superior court for the purpose of affording an opportunity to amend the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 11928: 11936: 11937: 11938: 11939: 11947: 11951: 11952: 11955: 11957: 21962: 119142026peak 1957 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing142 S.E. 890 (Ga. 1928)
  2. Harrison v. Harrison65 S.E.2d 173 (Ga. 1951)
  3. Simpson v. Hayes69 S.E.2d 567 (Ga. 1952)
  4. McRae v. Sears187 S.E. 664 (Ga. 1936)
  5. United States v. Hatcher196 S.E. 773 (Ga. 1938)
  6. Durham v. Smith3 S.E.2d 719 (Ga. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Duvall v. Cox123 S.E.2d 546 (Ga. 1962)
  2. Henry & Hutchinson v. Slack99 S.E.2d 465 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957) · Concurrence
  3. Jones v. West End Theatre Co.97 S.E.2d 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957)
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Davis89 S.E.2d 566 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955)
  5. Simpson v. Hayes69 S.E.2d 567 (Ga. 1952)
  6. Harrison v. Harrison65 S.E.2d 173 (Ga. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Cent. R.R. & Banking Co. v. Paterson, 13 S.E. 525 (Ga. 1891) 32
Benning v. Horkan, 51 S.E. 333 (Ga. 1905) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list