Southern Railway Co. v. Ray
Southern Railway Company v. Ray
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. The grounds of the motion for new trial in this ease; in regard to the admissibility of evidence, refusal to charge, and the charge of the court, are without merit, and do not require elaboration.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Green v. Central R. Co., 130 Ga. 375 ( 60 S. E. 861 ), and citations; Southern R. Co. v. Williams, 113 Ga. 335 ( 38 S. E. 744 ); Georgia, Florida & Alabama R. Co. v. Summer, 133 Ga. 135 ( 65 S. E. 381 ).
Judgment affirmed.
Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.