Hill v. Duke
Hill v. Duke, 77 S.E. 584 (Ga. 1913)
Summary
Equitable petition. Before Judge Brand. ■ Jackson superior court. October 5, 1911.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. The charge was substantially correct, and adjusted to the evidence. In-so far as proper, the requests to charge were covered by the general charge.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict) and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.