TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Weiner Bros. v. Tucker

Weiner Brothers Company v. Tucker

Weiner Bros. v. Tucker, 77 S.E. 811 (Ga. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 11, 1913
Judges
Atkinson
Citations
77 S.E. 811139 Ga. 5961913 Ga. LEXIS 529
Summary
Complaint. Before Judge Maddox. Chattooga superior court. April 10, 1912.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Atkinson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Atkinson, J.

1. Agency can not be proved by evidence of mere declarations of the alleged agent; but when accompanied by other evidence as to the conduct of the person in the character of agent, and acceptance ' by the alleged- principal of the fruits of the agency, such declarations are admissible in evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Beelc, J., absent. The other Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11918: 11928: 11936: 11940: 11948: 11966: 11997: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.148 S.E.2d 921 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
  2. William Hester Marble Co. v. Walton96 S.E. 269 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918)
  3. Puckett v. Reese48 S.E.2d 297 (Ga. 1948)
  4. Power v. Garrison81 S.E. 225 (Ga. 1914)
  5. Hudson v. Santangelo492 S.E.2d 673 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
  6. Glover v. Summerour141 S.E. 211 (Ga. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Hudson v. Santangelo492 S.E.2d 673 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
  2. Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.148 S.E.2d 921 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
  3. Puckett v. Reese48 S.E.2d 297 (Ga. 1948)
  4. Lawhon v. Henshaw11 S.E.2d 846 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
  5. Wofford Oil Co. v. Story183 S.E. 840 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936)
  6. Glover v. Summerour141 S.E. 211 (Ga. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list