TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cooper v. Bowen

Cooper v. Bowen, 78 S.E. 413 (Ga. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1913
Judges
Evans
Citations
78 S.E. 413140 Ga. 451913 Ga. LEXIS 20
Summary
Equitable petition, etc. Before Judge Martin. Dodge superior court. July 30, 1912.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Evans

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Evans, P. J.

1. A plaintiff, alleging herself to be the surviving partner-of a partnership, brought a suit in trover to recover property as belonging to'the firm. Subsequently the same plaintiff filed a suit in equity against the same defendant to recover other property of the partnership, praying for an accounting, a receiver, and a merger of the trover suit in the equitable action. Held, that it was not error to consolidate the former suit with the equitable action.

2. A verdict rendered in the equity suit in favor of the plaintiff for “$750 with interest” is not void. There being no specific allegations in the pleadings for the recovery of any particular stun with interest from a particular time, which would serve to impress the verdict as having relation to fixing interest on the amount recovered from a particular date, the verdict will be construed as a recovery of interest from the date of the verdict.

3. A defendant can not complain that the plaintiff’s verdict is for a les-, amount than that authorized by the evidence.

4. The verdict is supported by the evidence.

5. Assignments of •error upon the rulings on demurrer and the allowance of an amendment were not discussed in the brief, .and will be treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 11916: 11917: 11925: 11931: 11933: 11934: 11947: 11951: 11954: 11975: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Spinks v. LaGrange Banking & Trust Co.129 S.E. 31 (Ga. 1925)
  2. West View Corp. v. Thunderbolt Yacht Basin Inc.65 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. 1951)
  3. Gilreath v. Argo219 S.E.2d 461 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  4. Smallpiece v. Johnson80 S.E.2d 296 (Ga. 1954)
  5. Myers v. Adams81 S.E. 595 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914)
  6. Bugg v. Perry & Faircloth156 S.E. 708 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Gilreath v. Argo219 S.E.2d 461 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
  2. Smallpiece v. Johnson80 S.E.2d 296 (Ga. 1954)
  3. West View Corp. v. Thunderbolt Yacht Basin Inc.65 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. 1951)
  4. Cagle v. Bell44 S.E.2d 119 (Ga. 1947)
  5. Sapp v. Sapp177 S.E. 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
  6. Empire State Development Co. v. Coggins171 S.E. 576 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list