Battle v. Hambrick
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Evans, P. J.
A plaintiff in attachment demurred to the defendant’s answer to the declaration filed in that proceeding. The court overruled the demurrer. The only ruling-complained of in the bill of exceptions being the overruling of the demurrer to the plea, and no final judgment appear *808 ing to have been rendered in the attachment case, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the writ of error. Continental National Bank v. Folsom, 70 Ga. 728 ; McLendon v. Western & Atlantic Railroad Co., 85 Ga. 129 ( 11 S. E. 580 ); Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); United Glass Co. v. McConnell, 110 Ga. 616 ( 36 S. E. 58 ); Vaughn v. Milner, 121 Ga. 436 ( 49 S. E. 287 ); Fugazsi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 ( 46 S. E. 831 ).
December 16, 1914. Attachment; from Colquitt superior court. Pctrlcer & Dowling, for plaintiff. Covington & Summerlin, for defendant.
Writ of error dismissed.
All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.