TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Waller v. Southern Ice & Coal Co.

Waller v. Southern Ice and Coal Company

Waller v. Southern Ice & Coal Co., 87 S.E. 888 (Ga. 1916)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 18, 1916
Judges
Atkinson, Beck
Citations
87 S.E. 888144 Ga. 6951916 Ga. LEXIS 86
Summary
Action for damages. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. December 18, 1914.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Beck

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Beck, J.

Where the driver of an automobile truck which belonged to the defendant company, and which was used solely for the purpose of carrying ice, while driving the truck, apparently in the ordinary discharge of his duties, upon the reqtiest of a boy having in charge as nurse a child of tender years, permitted the nurse and the child in his charge to get upon the running-board of the truck, which was about twelve inches from the ground and about twelve inches broad, and ride thereon, such action upon the part of the driver in giving permission to the children to mount the running-board and in allowing them to ride was entirely without the scope of his duties as an employee of the owner of the truck. And where the child of tender years, in dismounting from the running-board, fell under the wheels of the truck while it was in motion, and was killed, the company was not liable in damages to the mother of the child, who brought suit against the company, alleging that the child contributed to her support and that she was dependent upon, him; and the court did not err in granting a nonsuit at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony. Bowler v. O’Connell, 162 Mass. 319 ( 38 N. E. 498 , 27 L. R. A. 173, 44 Am. St. R. 359 ); Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Hudson, 10 Ga. App. 169 ( 73 S. E. 30 ); Central Georgia *696 Power Co. v. Walker, 144 Ga. 124 ( 86 S. E. 319 ); Dover v. Mays Mfg. Co., 157 N. C. 324 ( 72 S. E. 1067 , 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 199, and eases cited in note); Driscoll v. Scanlon, 165 Mass. 348 ( 43 N. E. 100 , 52 Am. St. R. 523 ). Judgment, affirmed.

February 18, 1916. Action for damages. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. December 18, 1914. W. D. McNeil and E. G. Powers, for plaintiff. Hardeman, Jones, Parle & Johnston, for defendant.

All the Justices concur.

Concurrence — Atkinson

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Atkinson, J.,

concurs specially, being of the opinion that the facts of this case do not bring it within the principle involved in McIver v. Florida, Central & Peninsular R. Co., 110 Ga. 223 ( 36 S. E. 75 , 65 L. R. A. 437).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1916: 11920: 11924: 11925: 11928: 11929: 21931: 11934: 11935: 21938: 11946: 11950: 11954: 11974: 11979: 119162026peak 1929 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Greeson v. Bailey146 S.E. 490 (Ga. 1929)
  2. Planters Cotton-Oil Co. v. Baker181 S.E. 671 (Ga. 1935)
  3. Bunch v. McLeskey161 S.E. 128 (Ga. 1931)
  4. Murphey v. New South Brewery & Ice Co.89 S.E. 704 (Ga. 1916)
  5. Morris v. Fruit Co.124 S.E. 807 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924)
  6. Huddle House, Inc. v. Burke211 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Ca 79-3691 Wanda Starr Wright, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James Lewis Wright v. Southern Bell Telephone Company605 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1979)
  2. Huddle House, Inc. v. Burke211 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
  3. Crane Auto Parts, Stewart Avenue Branch, Inc. v. Patterson82 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)
  4. Hicks v. Swift & Co.58 S.E.2d 256 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950)
  5. Monroe Motor Express v. Jackson38 S.E.2d 863 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946)
  6. Summers v. Barron200 S.E. 228 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938) · Concurrence

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
Bowler v. O'Connell, 27 L.R.A. 173 (Mass. 1894) 42
Driscoll v. Scanlon, 43 N.E. 100 (Mass. 1896) 42
Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Hudson, 73 S.E. 30 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911) 25
Cent. Ga. Power Co. v. Walker, 86 S.E. 319 (Ga. 1915) 4
Mciver v. Fla. Cent. & Peninsular R.R., 36 S.E. 775 (Ga. 1900) 24
Dover v. Mfg. Co., 72 S.E. 1067 (N.C. 1911) 21
Morgan v. Prior, 36 S.E. 75 (Ga. 1900) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list