Dorminey v. Mathis
Dorminey v. Mathis, tax-collector
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Atkinson, J.
1. There was no error sufficient to cause a reversal on account of any ruling admitting evidence to which proper objection was made.
2. Upon conflicting evidence, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices' concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.