Mungin v. State
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Eisn, C. J.
1. The remarks of the judge addressed to counsel for the accused in presence of the jury, of which complaint is made in the amendment to the motion for new trial, do not amount to an expression of an opinion on a material matter involved in the case, and do not afford ground for a reversal.
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.