Mike D. Lee, D/B/A Mid-South Investment v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Mike D. LEE, D/B/A Mid-South Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The court corrects its opinion to the extent that it erroneously referred to “releases” in the Daingerfield transaction documents, 943 F.2d 554, 560 (5th Cir.1991); the presence or absence of release language does not, however, affect our analysis of the estoppel issue.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.