Cobb v. Coffey
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, J.
1. The assignment of error, complaining of the refusal of the judge to allow a witness on direct examination to answer a question, which fails to specify what the witness would have testified had he been permitted to answer the question, is insufficient to present any question for decision. Rogers v. Condon, 144 Ga. 390 (3) ( 87 S. E. 397 ); Featherston v. American National Bank, 146 Ga. 13 ( 90 S. E. 282 ).
2. Applying the principles announced in the former rulings in this case the court did not err, under the, pleadings and evidence, in granting a non-suit. Co ffey v. Cobb, 140 Ga. 661 ( 79 S. E. 568); s. c. 143 Ga. 539 ( 85 S. E. 693 ); s. c. 146 Ga. 689 ( 92 S. E. 57 ); Cobb v. Coffey, 148 Ga. 101 ( 95 S. E. 966 ).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.