Cone v. Wall
Cone v. Wall, 139 S.E. 2 (Ga. 1927)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, J.
There is no substantial error in the charge of the court complained of. The verdict is supported by the evidence, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Appeal and Error, 4 O. J. p. 852, n. 56; p. 1130, n. 63.
Ejectment, 19 C. J. p. 1178, n. 30.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
J. G. Murphy and George B. Rush, for plaintiff in error. P. K. Burns and J. J. Barge, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.