TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Coates v. State

Coates v. State, 140 S.E. 287 (Ga. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 17, 1927
Docket
No. 6215
Judges
Gilbert
Citations
140 S.E. 287165 Ga. 1911927 Ga. LEXIS 347

Opinion of the Court — Gilbert

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Gilbert, J.

Robert Coates was convicted of the offense of murdering his wife, Bylly Bell Coates. His motion for new trial consisted of the general grounds, and one ground complaining that while the voir dire questions were being propounded to the panel of 48 jurors, one of them responded: “I have heard so much against the defendant that I am prejudiced;” and that thereupon counsel for movant “moved that the entire panel be disqualified,” which motion the court overruled. Held:

1. The court did not err in overruling the motion to disqualify the entire panel of 48 because of the reply of a member thereof to questions on voir dire.

2. The verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justice concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1954: 11977: 11978: 11984: 21988: 12003: 119542026peak 1984 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lingerfelt v. State249 S.E.2d 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  2. Strozier v. State586 S.E.2d 309 (Ga. 2003)
  3. State v. Weidlich269 S.W.2d 69 (Mo. 1954)
  4. Johnson v. State373 S.E.2d 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
  5. Giles v. State317 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. 1984)
  6. Stone v. State316 S.E.2d 836 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Strozier v. State586 S.E.2d 309 (Ga. 2003)
  2. Johnson v. State373 S.E.2d 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
  3. Giles v. State317 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. 1984)
  4. Stone v. State316 S.E.2d 836 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
  5. Lingerfelt v. State249 S.E.2d 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  6. Rogers v. State238 S.E.2d 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list