Thompson v. Texas Co.
Thompson v. Texas Company
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
• Hnx, J.
1. A filling-station is not per se a nuisance. 2. The allegations of the petition do not show that the filling-station which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from erecting will be so erected or operated as to make the same a nuisance.
3. The court below did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition as amended. Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 165 Ga. 575 ( 141 S. E. 643 ), and cit. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concw.
W. N. Oliver, for plaintiff. Slaion & Hopkins, for defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.