Kent v. Lane
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hill, J.
In a suit by a remainderman to enjoin the lessees of the life-tenant from working certain trees for turpentine purposes by hacking, chipping, and cupping the pine trees, the judge did not err at an interlocutory hearing, under the pleadings and the evidence, in passing an order the effect of which was to grant an injunction, but to permit the defendants to continue working the trees upon giving a bond to be approved by the clerk of the court, as provided in the order. Farrar Lumber Co. v. Andrews Co., 150 Ga. 252 ( 103 S. E. 494 ); Gleaton v. Aultman, 150 Ga. 768 ( 105 S. E. 445 ) ; Lee & Bradshaw v. Rogers, 151 Ga. 838 (1, 2) ( 108 S. E. 371 ).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.