TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company

Burkhalter v. Va.-Carolina Chem. Co., 152 S.E. 98 (Ga. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 26, 1930
Docket
No. 7273
Citations
152 S.E. 98170 Ga. 2371930 Ga. LEXIS 426

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

This case involves a distribution of money arising from the sale of property under a senior judgment and execution. The holder of a junior judgment and execution claims the fund upon the ground that the judgment in the older case is void, because at the time of its rendition the defendant therein was insane and confined in the State Sanitarium. Held, that this is not an equity case within the meaning of the constitution declaring the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19; Berrie v. Smith, 97 Ga. 782 ( 25 S. E. 757 ) ; Elmore v. Southern Bank & Trust Co., 150 Ga. 811 ( 105 S. E. 474 ) ; Hosch v. Smith, 154 Ga. 789 ( 115 S. E. 646 ). Accordingly, the ease will he Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

Russell, C. J., absent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11945: 11950: 11954: 11961: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Williams v. Russell60 S.E.2d 243 (Ga. 1950)
  2. Refrigeration-Appliances, Inc. v. Atlanta Provision Co.80 S.E.2d 683 (Ga. 1954)
  3. Columbus Plumbing, Heating, & Mill Supply Co. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n119 S.E.2d 118 (Ga. 1961)
  4. Piedmont Savings Co. v. Chapman153 S.E. 4 (Ga. 1930)
  5. Mulligan v. Wingard33 S.E.2d 269 (Ga. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Berrie v. Smith, 25 S.E. 757 (Ga. 1896) 15
Elmore v. Southern Bank & Trust Co., 105 S.E. 474 (Ga. 1921) 7
Hosch v. Smith, 115 S.E. 646 (Ga. 1923) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list