Fussell v. Daniels
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Beck, P. J.
1. The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. Civil Code, § 3016; Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654 ( 78 S. E. 30 , 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773) ; Richardson v. Cade, 150 Ga. 535 ( 104 S. E. 207 ); Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357 ( 114 S. E. 182 ); Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 ( 95 S. E. 222 ); Heery v. Heery, 144 Ga. 467 ( 87 S. E. 472 ); Eagon v. Conway, 115 Ga. 130 ( 41 S. E. 493 ); Belt v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 ( 56 S. E. 81 ).
2. The special grounds of demurrer, so far as meritorious, were met by amendment. While other grounds may have pointed out defects in the pleadings, they were not of such materiality as to make it reversible error to overrule them. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
E. L. Grantham and Kelley & Dickerson, for plaintiffs in error. McDonald & Gilson, contra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.